Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Total views : 372

Leveraging Information Technology for Effective Performance Appraisal in the Nigerian Public Service

Affiliations

  • Baze University Abuja Nigeria, Nigeria

Abstract


The paper explores the utility of information technology in facilitating effective performance appraisal in the public service sector of Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation. Save for recent developments such as TSA (Treasury Single Account), IPPIS (Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System), and GIFMIS (Government Integrated Financial Management Information System), the Nigerian Public Service remains largely manual in its operations. Poor service delivery in performance appraisal - evaluating employees and checking what they have done, or not done, what they have done poorly or well, and where improvement is needed – is sometimes associated with job dissatisfaction and under-performance. As a possible solution, the paper proposes information technology-based performance appraisal approach within an integrated Systems-Goal-Setting theoretical framework. The study was based on published materials and focal group discussions with selected stakeholders from across the country. It is explained how a robust performance appraisal is a priceless tool for strategy execution and leadership effectiveness. A technology-based employee appraisal model is illustrated in simple cases using a spreadsheet package on a 5-level rating scale. The feasibility and relative simplicity of IT-based performance appraisal approach is elucidated. Some major challenges including phobia for the numeric and general reluctance to embrace technology-change in performance appraisal practice are highlighted. The implications for staff training and development and scope for future research are covered.

Keywords

Performance Appraisal Information System (PAIS), Performance Contract, Results-Based Management (RBM), Office Productivity Computing, Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS).

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 2)

References


  • Ajayi, O. (2009). Contemporary management issues and challenges. Ibadan: Anol Publications. ISBN: 978-978-900-163-7.
  • Bhattacharya, M. S., &Sengupta, N. (2009). Compensation management. New Delhi: Excel Books.
  • Buhari, M. (2016). Text of President Buhari’s Anniversary Speech. The Punch. Retrieved from www.punchng.com [Accessed on May 29, 2016].
  • Bureau of Public Service Reforms [BPSR]. (2014). The Challenges of transforming the civil service: The reforms of Alhaji Bukar Goni Aji, CON, Head of the Civil Service of the Federation. Abuja: BPSR.
  • Chopra, A. (2014). Innovative state: How new technologies can transform government. Atlantic Monthly Press.
  • Civil Service Agency. (2013, March). Civil service performance management system: A guide to performance management. Monrovia: Civil Service Agency.
  • Commonwealth Secretariat. (2010). Managing and measuring performance in the public service in commonwealth Africa: Report of the sixth commonwealth forum of heads of African public services Mahe, Seychelles. Improving African Public Services Series: No.6.London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
  • Dobbs, R., J. Manyika, & Woetzel, J. (2015). No ordinary disruption: The four forces breaking all the trends.Public Affairs. ISBN: 978-1-610395793.
  • Dogarawa, L. B. (2011, December). A new model for performance measurement in the Nigerian Public Service.International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 212-221.
  • Fletcher, C. (2001, November). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 482.
  • Frisby, D. (2014). Bitcoin: The future of money? London: Unbound. ISBN: 978-1-78352-077-0.
  • Enikanselu, S. A., & Oyende, A. I. (2009). Essentials of management. Lagos: Enykon Consults. ISBN 978-978-901-455-2.
  • Epstein, M., & Manzoni, J. (1997). The balanced scorecard and tableau de bord: Translating strategy into action. Management Accounting, 79(2), 28–36.
  • Gates, W. H. (1999). Business at the speed of thought: Succeeding in the digital economy. New York: Business Plus.
  • Grote, D. (2011). How to be good at performance appraisals: Simple, effective, done right. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Hindle, T. (2008). Guide to management ideas and gurus. London: Profile Books Ltd.
  • Kaplan, R. S., &Norton D. P. (2000). The Strategy-focused organization: How Balanced Scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 978-1578512508.
  • Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G.(2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. (3rded.). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited, Publishers.
  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
  • Kumar, V., Sunder, S., & Leone, R. P. (2015, April). How to forecast performance and then tailor training and incentive. Harvard Business Review (pp. 63-68).
  • Locke, E. A. (1968). Towards a theory of task performance and incentives. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 3, 157-64.
  • Locke, E. A., &Lathan, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal-setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 9, 705-717.
  • Lombardo, M., & Eichinger, R. (2003).The leadership architect norms and validity report.Minneapolis, MN: Lominger.
  • Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling Strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, 47.
  • Malos, S. B. (1998). Current legal issues in performance appraisal. In J. W. Sither (Ed). Performance appraisal: State-of-the-art methods for performance management(pp. 49-94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ministry of Public Service. (2007, July). Staff performance appraisal in the public service: Guidelines for managers. Kampala: Ministry of Public Service. Retrieved from https://www.publicservice.go.ug
  • Muchinsky, P. M. (2012). Psychology applied to work.(10thed.). Summerfield, NC: Hypergraphic Press.
  • Murthy, L. (2015). In “Time to bell the curve”, Times Ascent, Mysuru, November 4, 2015. p. 13
  • Niven, P. R. (2006). Balanced Scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results.(2nded.). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF). (2014, December). Public Service Reforms in Nigeria, 1999 – 2014: A comprehensive review. Abuja: OSGF.
  • Olaopa, T. (2015). Change agenda: The devil in the details of execution. Presentation at the Nigerian Economic
  • Summit. Retrieved from https://www.ngrguardiannews.com (Accessed on 25th October, 2015).
  • Ordonez, L. D., Schweitker, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., &Bazerman, M. H. (2009, February).Goals gone wild: The systematic side-effects of over-prescribing goal-setting.Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard. Retrieved from http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/09-083.pdf (Accessed on 11th November 2015).
  • Parasuraman, N. R. (2014). Financial management: A step-by-step approach. Delhi: Centage Learning India Pvt. Ltd.
  • Public Service Commission. (2013, May).Handbook: Public service staff performance review, performance appraisal and decision-making. Accra: Public Service Commission Ghana.
  • Rao, C. A. (2012). Performance management.Biztantra. ISBN: 978-93-5004-289-2.
  • Rao, T. V. (2004). Performance management and appraisal systems: HR tools for global competitiveness. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Roberge, M. (2015, April). The right way to use compensation. Harvard Business Review,p. 70-75.
  • Selden, S. C., Ingraham, P. W., & Jacobson, W. (2001). Human resource practices in state government: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 598-607.
  • Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.(2nded.).Random House Business Books.
  • Schwaninger, M., & Mandl C. (2012). Understanding the system dynamics of high-technology markets: pölya processes with positive feedback, path dependence and lock-in. In Roberto Moreno-Dfaz Franz Pichler Alexis Quesada-Arencibia (Eds.), 13th International Conference Computer Aided Systems Theory — EUROCAST2011 (pp. 129-136). Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain February 6-11, 2011 Revised Selected Papers, Part 1. ISBN 978-3-642-27548-7 e-ISBN 978-3-642-27549-4 DOl 10.1007/978-3-642-27549-4, New York: Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht.Retrieved from http://www.mlp.co.at/fileadmin/artikel/Ver/230_Polya_Processes_2012_Schwaninger-Mandl.pdf (Accessed on 24 August 2015).
  • Spiegel, M. R., & Stephens, L. J. (2011). Statistics.(4thed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Spinks, N., Wells, B., & Meche, M. (1999). Appraising appraisals: Computerized performance appraisal systems. Career Development International, 4(2), 94-100.
  • Stine R. E.,&Foster, D.(2011).Statistics for business: Decision making and analysis. Dorling Kindersley India Pvt. Ltd.
  • Sudarsan, A. (2009). Performance appraisal systems: A survey of organizational views. The ICFAI University Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 3(1), 54-69.
  • Susskind, R. (2013). Tomorrow’s lawyers: An introduction to your future. Oxford University Press.
  • Tooki, A. (2016). Fixing society with technology. Business World. p. 21. Retrieved from www.businessworldng.com (Accessed on 8-15 February 2016)
  • Top performance appraisal software products. (2015).Retrieved from http://www.capterra.com/performance-appraisal-software/ (Accessed on 10th November 2015).
  • Ukpong, L (2016). ‘Nigeria grapples with first full-year recession in 29 years’, in Mbalu, M., The Guardian, 32(13), 1, 6-7.
  • Zoltners, A. (2015, April). Getting beyond ‘show me the money’. Interview with in Harvard Business Review,p. 77-81.
  • Online sources Retrieved from http://gifmis.gov.ng/gifmis/index.php/12-faq/23-what-is-gifmis on March 11, 2016

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.